the misconception people like to believe is that the fetus Has the right to life. The "right to life" doesn't imply a right to use an individuals body. People have the right to refuse to donate organs, for example, even if doing so would save another life.
Then why is the murder of a pregnant woman classified as double homo side in the court of law? It is clearly seen as a "Right to life" in that instance, but not when the fetus itself is being aborted? The pro-choice argument does not make sense in this case, especially when the law contradicts itself.
@Lee Scott Each of us hold an equal right to life to a degree, because no one has that right when it comes to using someone else's body without their consent. Acknowledging that the fetus is a life under is not justification to attribute it specials rights. This is literal a reinstatement of the original comment.
@Julia - A beating heart and brain activity to be ended with pain (yes, it is scientifically proven that the murdering of an unborn baby will cause pain to the aforementioned fetus) is wrong, and the Democratic Party is a proud supporter of the "Human Rights Movement", however denies the right to human life. So yes life beginning at conception is the only logical and fair line to draw to define where human life exists, so that is denying the right to human life (aka: living, which is denied in the process of murdering a baby, aka: abortion). #Logic
No baby is murdered. That's only sound through pro-life propaganda, but nowhere else. To think it is murder for a woman to deny gestation for the is the same as me denying to donate my blood, tissue, organs, etc. thus I am murdering the thousands of children on the donor list.
@Brian Cevallos Than what is it, the something inside a woman? That something has its own DNA code that is completely different from the woman's, it is programmed to look a certain way and more.
I agree life begins at conception, but calling it a baby and saying they're being murdered is just sensationalism and overall irrelevant. No biological parent is legally obligated to provide their born child any form of bodily donation, but pregnant people are an exception? What's the justification for this?
The people need to recognize when there is a crisis such as abortion being legal in the US. It is not the concept of reproductive freedom that I disagree with, however it is the concept of murdering unborn babies.
The people also need to realize that you cannot tell someone else what to do with their bodies. if a woman has a valid reason for the abortion( which should be discussed with her doctor) then she should be able to get a abortion. Now with that being said there also needs to be a point in time where an abortion can no longer be given. But everyone that feels so strongly about abortions should also feel the same way towards the foster care system. That system has been broken for a very long time. If you want to stop abortions then fix the foster care system, because that's where most of the children will end up.
i understand your argument was that abortion is murder. to answer that we must explore that further. is a miscarriage involuntary manslaughter. are all choses that ends life called murder? if that is the case, all things that lesson life should be addressed before abortion. you and everyone would change their answer if Times Square showed the population of people growing every second. You may be amond the people who would suggest we need purge in order to lower population. my twisted my goes far
Yes, I agree that getting an abortion is sad, by deleting a fetus. Here’s the thing. A fetus is not yet a baby. It is cells slowly forming parts that are slowly forming babies. If you think a heap of baby parts not attached together is a baby, I’m afraid you are mistaken. Women who are raped should get to get rid of the baby. When a women are having a baby, they should be able to choose whether they want to go through hours of extreme pain, years of caring for a child and paying their fees. Some people are not in a situation where they can properly take care of a child, and when they are given up to orphanages they will feel completely unwanted. And then when children do end up getting adopted, if it’s a gay couple MAGA slaves complain. There are too many orphans, and so hating on LGBTQ and saying that they can’t adopt while forcing women to give up their children contradicts your opinion.
I agree with you that supporting a child is difficult, however I have to disagree when you say that a fetus is a heap of baby parts. A fetus is a human organism (with human DNA) that is growing and developing kind of like how a 1 month old grows and develops into a toddler.
Do you consider the seed of a plant to have feelings? My guess is no unless you are actually crazy. Well isn’t a fetus basically a seed? Plants are living things and so are humans but now all the sudden a fetus is the opposite of a seed. The process is the same. As someone else in the comments said: you have the choice to donate an organ and even though it could save someone’s life it is a choice. Abortion is the same thing but to a seed. So should if abortion is illegal than every person the US should HAVE to donate an organ unless they are the ones in need of it. This is what Republicans try to do. Instead of focusing on humans that are here and actually living they choose to focus on the seeds. If God gave us free will and we have this technology than shouldn’t we be allowed to use it?
If the mother had a two year old in need of an organ transplant and she is the only person who matches, should it be legal to force her to donate that organ?
The two year old is a child by definition, so we have taken the term out of relevancy. Also if that same two year old is capable of using someone's body without their consent, I wouldn't declare them as innocent - so we have also taken innocence out of relevancy. So if the two year old cannot use his/her mother's body for an organ, then the fetus does not have that right either in regards for the pregnant person's ENTIRE body being used.
Look. People (woman in particular ) have been made to believe that it's really their choice, and that it's the better choice... I HIGHLY implore you to research SENOMYX.. They have created what i'm calling a "Circle of Consumers" Senomyx uses aborted fetal limbs to amplify certain flavors...
They have manipulated so many irresponsible woman (EXCLUDING UNFORTUNATE OCCURRENCES) into having unprotected sex purely for pleasure, than getting stuck with a kid that they tell them to abort so they can make your chips and pop taste better.
If you want to have sex, fucking be prepared. if not you contribute to the inevitable extinction of a fairly promising species... the human race
No a fetus is NOT basically a seed. A seed has no chance at becoming a plant if it isn’t given soil, water and sunlight. An unfertilized egg is more comparable to a seed.
If A woman willingly has sex she should be prepared to take responsibility for her actions no matter what. Babies don’t just pick a uterus and claim homestead they are put there. So if the question is INNOCENCE then yes they are innocent and deserve to a chance to grow not be murdered. If I choose to get drunk and drive a car, I am accepting the risk of going to jail. There is no OWI clinic I for me to pay and have all the problems I caused myself gone forever. If you choose to have sex you are accepting the risk of becoming pregnant and should have to deal with the consequences of your actions. Abortions should only be performed when the pregnancy is a result of rape.
And yes God gave us magnificent abilities. One of them being pregnant and growing a child inside our bodies. He also gave us the intelligence to make bombs and missiles. We only use those when we have to why can’t abortion be treated the same way?
It depends whether the pregnant was raped or by accident,if it is about my money then it should be illegal to abort considering how the choice is made on the dependency of the financial status and because there could be government subsidies.If you are not ready to take care of the baby than it can be put up for adoption. So in my opinion is that abortion should be illegal but with a ability to have put up a case on why they should be able to abort.Unless rape if so than legal.
the misconception people like to believe is that the fetus Has the right to life. The "right to life" doesn't imply a right to use an individuals body. People have the right to refuse to donate organs, for example, even if doing so would save another life.
Then why is the murder of a pregnant woman classified as double homo side in the court of law? It is clearly seen as a "Right to life" in that instance, but not when the fetus itself is being aborted? The pro-choice argument does not make sense in this case, especially when the law contradicts itself.
@Lee Scott Each of us hold an equal right to life to a degree, because no one has that right when it comes to using someone else's body without their consent. Acknowledging that the fetus is a life under is not justification to attribute it specials rights. This is literal a reinstatement of the original comment.
@Julia - A beating heart and brain activity to be ended with pain (yes, it is scientifically proven that the murdering of an unborn baby will cause pain to the aforementioned fetus) is wrong, and the Democratic Party is a proud supporter of the "Human Rights Movement", however denies the right to human life. So yes life beginning at conception is the only logical and fair line to draw to define where human life exists, so that is denying the right to human life (aka: living, which is denied in the process of murdering a baby, aka: abortion). #Logic
No baby is murdered. That's only sound through pro-life propaganda, but nowhere else. To think it is murder for a woman to deny gestation for the is the same as me denying to donate my blood, tissue, organs, etc. thus I am murdering the thousands of children on the donor list.
@Brian Cevallos Than what is it, the something inside a woman? That something has its own DNA code that is completely different from the woman's, it is programmed to look a certain way and more.
I agree life begins at conception, but calling it a baby and saying they're being murdered is just sensationalism and overall irrelevant. No biological parent is legally obligated to provide their born child any form of bodily donation, but pregnant people are an exception? What's the justification for this?
abortions are none of most peoples business
It is when the mother is committing murder of another human being.
The people need to recognize when there is a crisis such as abortion being legal in the US. It is not the concept of reproductive freedom that I disagree with, however it is the concept of murdering unborn babies.
The people also need to realize that you cannot tell someone else what to do with their bodies. if a woman has a valid reason for the abortion( which should be discussed with her doctor) then she should be able to get a abortion. Now with that being said there also needs to be a point in time where an abortion can no longer be given. But everyone that feels so strongly about abortions should also feel the same way towards the foster care system. That system has been broken for a very long time. If you want to stop abortions then fix the foster care system, because that's where most of the children will end up.
i understand your argument was that abortion is murder. to answer that we must explore that further. is a miscarriage involuntary manslaughter. are all choses that ends life called murder? if that is the case, all things that lesson life should be addressed before abortion. you and everyone would change their answer if Times Square showed the population of people growing every second. You may be amond the people who would suggest we need purge in order to lower population. my twisted my goes far
@Nolan's Life it is not a woman's body it is a completely different
Yes, I agree that getting an abortion is sad, by deleting a fetus. Here’s the thing. A fetus is not yet a baby. It is cells slowly forming parts that are slowly forming babies. If you think a heap of baby parts not attached together is a baby, I’m afraid you are mistaken. Women who are raped should get to get rid of the baby. When a women are having a baby, they should be able to choose whether they want to go through hours of extreme pain, years of caring for a child and paying their fees. Some people are not in a situation where they can properly take care of a child, and when they are given up to orphanages they will feel completely unwanted. And then when children do end up getting adopted, if it’s a gay couple MAGA slaves complain. There are too many orphans, and so hating on LGBTQ and saying that they can’t adopt while forcing women to give up their children contradicts your opinion.
I agree with you that supporting a child is difficult, however I have to disagree when you say that a fetus is a heap of baby parts. A fetus is a human organism (with human DNA) that is growing and developing kind of like how a 1 month old grows and develops into a toddler.
Do you consider the seed of a plant to have feelings? My guess is no unless you are actually crazy. Well isn’t a fetus basically a seed? Plants are living things and so are humans but now all the sudden a fetus is the opposite of a seed. The process is the same. As someone else in the comments said: you have the choice to donate an organ and even though it could save someone’s life it is a choice. Abortion is the same thing but to a seed. So should if abortion is illegal than every person the US should HAVE to donate an organ unless they are the ones in need of it. This is what Republicans try to do. Instead of focusing on humans that are here and actually living they choose to focus on the seeds. If God gave us free will and we have this technology than shouldn’t we be allowed to use it?
If the mother had a two year old in need of an organ transplant and she is the only person who matches, should it be legal to force her to donate that organ?
The two year old is a child by definition, so we have taken the term out of relevancy. Also if that same two year old is capable of using someone's body without their consent, I wouldn't declare them as innocent - so we have also taken innocence out of relevancy. So if the two year old cannot use his/her mother's body for an organ, then the fetus does not have that right either in regards for the pregnant person's ENTIRE body being used.
Look. People (woman in particular ) have been made to believe that it's really their choice, and that it's the better choice... I HIGHLY implore you to research SENOMYX.. They have created what i'm calling a "Circle of Consumers" Senomyx uses aborted fetal limbs to amplify certain flavors... They have manipulated so many irresponsible woman (EXCLUDING UNFORTUNATE OCCURRENCES) into having unprotected sex purely for pleasure, than getting stuck with a kid that they tell them to abort so they can make your chips and pop taste better. If you want to have sex, fucking be prepared. if not you contribute to the inevitable extinction of a fairly promising species... the human race
No a fetus is NOT basically a seed. A seed has no chance at becoming a plant if it isn’t given soil, water and sunlight. An unfertilized egg is more comparable to a seed.
If A woman willingly has sex she should be prepared to take responsibility for her actions no matter what. Babies don’t just pick a uterus and claim homestead they are put there. So if the question is INNOCENCE then yes they are innocent and deserve to a chance to grow not be murdered. If I choose to get drunk and drive a car, I am accepting the risk of going to jail. There is no OWI clinic I for me to pay and have all the problems I caused myself gone forever. If you choose to have sex you are accepting the risk of becoming pregnant and should have to deal with the consequences of your actions. Abortions should only be performed when the pregnancy is a result of rape.
And yes God gave us magnificent abilities. One of them being pregnant and growing a child inside our bodies. He also gave us the intelligence to make bombs and missiles. We only use those when we have to why can’t abortion be treated the same way?
It depends whether the pregnant was raped or by accident,if it is about my money then it should be illegal to abort considering how the choice is made on the dependency of the financial status and because there could be government subsidies.If you are not ready to take care of the baby than it can be put up for adoption. So in my opinion is that abortion should be illegal but with a ability to have put up a case on why they should be able to abort.Unless rape if so than legal.