behaviours whether good or bad vary in their definition by many. For instance, the banality of evil, some commit deeds that are considered 'evil' by standardised norms but completely believe their behaviour to be good. So how can you say for sure that something is 'good' or 'evil'. That would only leave good and bad intentions/behaviours.
I don't need a sophisticated response, just any discussion on the basis of what I wrote :)
I used to believe in moral relativity and moral grey areas. But now I do believe there is indeed good and evil. If ones existence is almost entirely antagonistic toward other life on earth, they're functionally evil. and vise versa. for example, Dahmer and Darrell Brooks are evil. just be cause they enjoyed their evil deeds does not make them less evil. That being said, it's rare to find people who are truly evil or truly good, most fall on a spectrum.