It has been shown that with most viruses, they will not go away but simply mutate to another strand. Although what is going on with the virus is a completely normal part of nature, the government is using it as a way to control the people by using the reasoning for "Safety Purposes." Though it is dangerous, the government has been so many precautions that they have violated constitutional rights such as civil protesting and worshiping our religions in the way that we please. The issue with this is that there is no guarantee that we will get our rights back as well as no one being able to stop the government from violating our constitutional and god given rights once the pandemic is over. The constitution will no longer be relevant to the government once the pandemic has slowed down, and the government will continue to violate our rights. Prove me wrong.
Search
I have one question. Can you see the future?
Nope, I am looking at the historical facts as well as the possibilities. If we do not start to make our wishes known in the country, it could result in the loss of our freedoms as explained in the constitution.
I completely agree. Politicians do not care what the data says. They are abusive of their power among states simply because of political calculation. They are basing their decisions aside from the science of this situation. Free states that base their decisions strictly upon science are loosening up on safety orders have no increase of Covid 19 cases. However, for example LA county is now suffering tighter orders from democratic power drunk Mayor Garcetti. He orders citizens to wear a mask whenever leaving their homes, even though there is zero science to backup this order along with many others. LA county’s healthcare system is completely stable, and hospitals are not flooded with sick people. The only point getting across is to shut up, and obey. These facts and more are provided by Tucker Carlson of Fox News, full information provided in the link below In support of this argument.
https://youtu.be/bIFh9aHkf0c
How is there "zero science" to back up wearing a mask when you leave the house in the middle of a global pandemic?
Agreed, some of the biggest worries is that we will have to live in this state of fear in the country. Some of the issues I am seeing with police getting involved in civil protests around the country for not "Social Distancing right" or priest getting arrested in new york for trying to give the sacrament to their worshipers. This violates the constitution and has no guarantee of ever getting the rights back. The constitution does not say that it is okay to violate the rights simply because there is a pandemic.
And ever better! Police aren’t even arresting those who violate stay at home orders! Have you heard of the gym reopening to protest against being enslaved to the government? Law enforcement was even in support of this! They are on our side, politicians are so ignorant of our wellbeing, our money, our opinions and feelings and lives.
You know the government is especially corrupt when the law officials won't follow through with the laws. One that is crazy is in my state, if a employee has any symptoms of the corona virus, the employer can be arrested and put in jail for a year, as well as having the entire business shut down. I can understand trying to keep people safe, but this situation is overkill and simply going to hurt our rights.
I don't understand the mentality that it should be the people vs. the government all the time. I understand that the government does not do everything perfectly, but as a whole they act on the best interests of society.
You ask to be proven wrong, yet provide no evidence to prove your claims. You state "The constitution will no longer be relevant to the government once the pandemic has slowed down, and the government will continue to violate our rights." which devalues your entire argument as you have provided no supporting evidence to your claim.
In reality, the government wants to minimise the impact on the economy over the long term. They will not impose any restrictions that damage the economy for longer than is necessary. Your accusations are baseless and cause you to sound irrational making it difficult to take anything you say with an ounce of trust.
The issue with the whole corona virus that people have failed to realize is that it is not just going to disappear no matter how much we quarantine ourselves and society. The human body needs to build up immunity to it, and being restricted by the government does not help the people or the economy. I can understand people that are at high risk, but they should be quarantining themselves of their own free will with repercussions from the government to help their particular cases financially and medically. Now the issues are whether the government with enact another shut down when we reach another peak, which would hurt the economy as a whole again. There were laws in the constitution that have been broke with religion and freedom of speech and there is no showing how much more they can control our rights. You may call me paranoid, but I will fight for my rights until death because I would rather be free than dead, and the government is the only entity that can take away my god given rights.
Nobody can ever take your rights away from you. Individual rights are innate and unalienable. Your rights can be respected or violated, but either way, you still have your rights. We get tyranny when people do not use our rights. That is the proper punishment we receive for not doing our job as citizens. Hopefully more people will learn what our rights are and how to use them and have the courage it takes to stand up for ourselves.
Although I am not completely sure of the evidence that you base your point behind, we need to understand that these 'controls' are feasible during a global pandemic. It is basic knowledge given the contagious nature of the virus that people should stay at home/ social distance and limit unnecessary use of public services. When it comes to, however, unjust forces of governmental power abusing and oppressing the people backed by wrong ideologies such as racism and discrimination, such practices should then be condemned. However, as far as the need for coorporation during these times is concerned, lawful enactments to minimise further development of the virus are highly agreeable and practical.