You seem to think being vegan would be some positive alternative to eating animals. The fact though is that it would simply be another path leading to this same result (though perhaps of a more arguably indirect route). Let me put this another way: what do animals eat? Do they eat vegetables, maybe? Plant-grown foods? So hm if 7 billion+ people turn to sustain themselves solely on this type of consumption (which only an exceedingly small percentage of them presently do), would it be fair to say animals would be facing some competition? Would it be reasonable to guess the rates of starvation, not to mention of wildlife environments destroyed to grow crops, would increase? It seems to me we'd simply be offering animals a new flavor of death.
Allow me to acquaint you with a fact of life: resources have limits to their production. Every resource you use is at the expense of another living thing. And yes this even includes your dainty fucking perfume and vewy pwetty nail polish that you look so motherfucking fabulous in. So if you really want to help animals, you'll do them a dandy little favor and remove yourself from worldly existence. Unless perhaps you think you are as entitled to existence as they are. In which case you'll do whatever the **** you please. After all that's exactly what animals do. 🙂
the fact that you believe that one detached general and vague sentence outright settles an argument tells me you cant debate for shit.
how can u say "like all others" if my brand of retardation is "particular". the concept of something that is particular implies that it is conceptually separate from "all others". do u know how language works
i bring this inconsistency up cus i feel like it kind of represents the logical inconsistency of argument as a whole.
Why do you believe this statement? Moral Reasons? Animal Cruelty? Environment? Explain
You seem to think being vegan would be some positive alternative to eating animals. The fact though is that it would simply be another path leading to this same result (though perhaps of a more arguably indirect route). Let me put this another way: what do animals eat? Do they eat vegetables, maybe? Plant-grown foods? So hm if 7 billion+ people turn to sustain themselves solely on this type of consumption (which only an exceedingly small percentage of them presently do), would it be fair to say animals would be facing some competition? Would it be reasonable to guess the rates of starvation, not to mention of wildlife environments destroyed to grow crops, would increase? It seems to me we'd simply be offering animals a new flavor of death.
Allow me to acquaint you with a fact of life: resources have limits to their production. Every resource you use is at the expense of another living thing. And yes this even includes your dainty fucking perfume and vewy pwetty nail polish that you look so motherfucking fabulous in. So if you really want to help animals, you'll do them a dandy little favor and remove yourself from worldly existence. Unless perhaps you think you are as entitled to existence as they are. In which case you'll do whatever the **** you please. After all that's exactly what animals do. 🙂